Article advocates for personal agency, rejects exploitative technology practices, emphasizes individual choice and control over devices. Structural design reflects privacy-conscious, anti-tracking principles. Content does not directly address universal dignity or global human principles, but individual autonomy framing aligns with dignity concepts.

No observable signals regarding equal dignity and rights in abstract sense.

No observable signals regarding non-discrimination principles; article is about consumer product selection, not institutional discrimination policy.

No observable signals regarding right to life, liberty, security of person.

No observable signals regarding slavery or servitude.

No observable signals regarding torture or cruel treatment.

No observable signals regarding right to recognition as person before law.

No observable signals regarding equal protection before law.

No observable signals regarding effective remedies for rights violations.

No observable signals regarding arbitrary arrest or detention.

No observable signals regarding fair and public hearing.

No observable signals regarding presumption of innocence or criminal procedure.

Editorial: Article explicitly discusses rejection of bloatware, advertising in apps, push notifications ads, and software that serves company interests over user interests. Advocates for privacy and control ('I do not tolerate' exploitative choices). Structural: Email obfuscation script, no visible tracking/ad networks, privacy-conscious API endpoints, RSS feed without analytics, reduce-animations preference support all indicate structural respect for privacy. Domain practice aligns with content values.

Editorial: Author frames freedom of choice in technology as important personal value (mentions 'I control exactly what goes on my phone', 'escape hatch', 'escape to it later' with rooting/LineageOS). Implicit freedom of movement within digital space. Structural: Free public access, multiple browsing options (standard web, Gemini protocol link), no forced authentication.

No observable signals regarding asylum or refuge.

No observable signals regarding nationality.

No observable signals regarding marriage or family.

No observable signals regarding property rights.

Mild signal: Author's software choices (LineageOS, Linux, ad-blockers) reflect freedom of thought and conscience regarding technology. No explicit discussion of conscience or belief system.

Editorial: Article extensively discusses freedom to receive and seek information (phone reviews, repair information, software documentation, rooting guides, custom OS communities). Author explicitly values information access and shares detailed findings publicly. Uses internet resources (Wikipedia, YouTube, iFixit, online reviews) to inform decisions. Advocates for user control over device information. Structural: RSS/Atom feeds enable information distribution; public blog freely accessible; Gemini protocol support; email obfuscation protects communication; no information paywalls or restrictions observed.

Editorial: Author describes community aspects ('People & places' section, buddies/links pages), participates in repair shop visits, online communities for phone modifications, references collaborative efforts (GCam port community, LineageOS community, online review communities). Mild advocacy for collective consumer awareness. Structural: Links to community resources (projects, buddies, links); Gemini protocol suggests participation in alternative internet communities.

No observable signals regarding political participation or public affairs.

No observable signals regarding social security or economic rights.

Minimal signal: Author mentions price considerations ('not one of the requirements') and acknowledges value of work (repair shops, parts sourcing). No substantial treatment of labor rights or employment.

No observable signals regarding rest or leisure.

Editorial: Author discusses phone durability, repair accessibility, and long-term usability as quality-of-life factors. Mentions battery health degradation and repairability as standards-of-living considerations. Structural: Accessibility features (reduce-animations, alt text) support digital well-being; privacy protections support health/safety; no aggressive dark patterns or manipulative design.

No observable signals regarding education.

Editorial: Core theme of article: appreciation for technology that respects user participation in its fruits (photography, gaming, communication, software customization). Author advocates against e-waste and planned obsolescence ('I do not tolerate' exploitative design). Discusses ability to participate in digital culture (custom ROMs, rooting, GCam ports, own app development possibilities). Criticizes design that excludes users from meaningful participation (locked bootloaders, artificial limitations post-root, app store monopolies). Structural: Open web practices (RSS, alternative protocols, no paywalls) enable participation in digital culture; accessibility features enable equal participation; rooting/ROM support enables meaningful involvement with device.

Editorial: Author implicitly appeals to a social order where users have rights (to repair, to choose software, to reject bloatware). Discusses systemic failures (3G shutdown timing, manufacturer design choices, repair shop economics). Structural: Blog operates within commons-oriented web practices; participates in open-source communities; supports alternative protocols.

Editorial: Author articulates duties and responsibilities implicitly: responsibility to avoid e-waste, to maintain devices, to respect others' autonomy (refusing to accept bloatware-laden experiences), to participate thoughtfully in communities. Advocates for balancing personal needs with broader concerns (device longevity, repair shop accessibility, avoiding forced obsolescence). Structural: Privacy protections respect others' data; accessibility features support others' participation; open standards enable broad participation.

No observable signals regarding misuse of rights to destroy other rights.