Article framing suggests institutional accountability (NHTSA probe, regulatory process). Mild positive lean toward human dignity and rule of law through regulatory oversight narrative. Structural tracking reduces score slightly.

Limited direct engagement with equality principle. Coverage of regulatory probe implies equal application of safety standards, but framing is narrow and corporate-focused.

Implicit reference to non-discrimination via regulatory scrutiny of automated systems. No explicit treatment of discrimination concerns. Mild positive signal from investigative oversight.

No observable content addressing right to life, liberty, personal security. Traffic violation investigation relates tangentially to public safety but does not directly engage Article 3 principles.

No direct engagement. Subject matter (autonomous vehicle regulation) is neutral on slavery/servitude. Slight negative signal from commercial focus.

Regulatory investigation and transparency about extension requests imply protection against arbitrary action and torture indirectly. Government accountability structure supports human dignity. Limited direct relevance.

Right to recognition before law implied via regulatory process scrutiny. Minimal direct engagement; framing centers on corporate compliance rather than individual rights.

Equal protection under law implied through regulatory investigation and equal application of safety standards. Headline emphasizes Tesla's difficulty complying, suggesting equal accountability. Moderate positive signal.

Government regulatory remedy system implied through NHTSA investigation. Limited direct engagement with remedy for rights violations. Structural modality weak.

Content does not address arbitrary detention. No positive engagement. Mild negative due to corporate-focused framing and absence of individual dignity emphasis.

Regulatory investigation implies fair, public hearing mechanism and equal access to justice system. NHTSA scrutiny suggests right to fair trial principles applied to corporate conduct. Limited direct relevance.

No observable content addressing presumption of innocence or criminal liability. Regulatory investigation context is civil/administrative, not criminal. Minimal engagement.

Multiple tracking systems (Google Tag Manager x2, Parsely, OneSignal, video player hub, Blockthrough) clearly documented in HTML. No visible privacy safeguards or opt-out mechanisms. Domain-level tracking modifier applied. Strong negative signal.

Open-access publication model enables freedom of movement and residence (information access). No paywall observed. Editorial coverage of government investigation supports free expression. Moderate positive. Domain access model modifier applied.

No explicit engagement with asylum or refugee rights. Subject matter (vehicle regulation) is unrelated. Minimal signal.

No direct treatment of nationality rights. Regulatory investigation implies equal application to all market participants. Limited indirect engagement.

Marriage/family rights not engaged. Tracking infrastructure (domain-level modifier) conflicts with protection of privacy in family matters. Neutral leaning negative.

Regulatory investigation into Tesla's data handling and compliance implies some protection of property rights through rule of law. Tracking systems on page undermine privacy protections. Mild positive offset by negative structural signal.

Freedom of thought, conscience, religion not engaged. Content is neutral. Minimal signal.

Open-access journalism covering government regulatory investigation. Editorial content (title, description) advocates for transparency about Tesla's FSD data submission delays. NewsMediaOrganization schema and masthead indicate editorial structure. Strong positive signal. Domain-level editorial code and mission modifiers applied.

Coverage of regulatory assembly (NHTSA) and governmental process implies support for freedom of peaceful assembly and association rights. Open-access model supports collective information access. Mild-to-moderate positive.

Coverage of government regulatory participation and transparency in decision-making supports right to participate in government. Reporting on investigative process and extensions implies public accountability. Moderate positive signal.

Implicit support for social/economic rights through coverage of labor-adjacent safety regulations (autonomous vehicle oversight). Regulatory scrutiny implies protection of workers and public. Limited direct engagement.

Right to work and just conditions not directly addressed. Vehicle regulation context is tangential to labor rights. Minimal signal.

Right to rest and leisure not engaged. Subject matter is unrelated. Minimal signal.

Right to adequate standard of living and social security implied through coverage of vehicle safety standards and public protection via regulatory investigation. Safety oversight supports health/security rights. Moderate positive signal.

Right to education not addressed. Content focuses on regulatory/safety matters. Minimal signal.

Right to participate in cultural life and protection of scientific progress implied through open-access journalism and technology regulation. Responsive design and accessibility features (screen reader support) support inclusive participation. Domain-level accessibility modifier applied. Moderate positive.

Right to social and international order supporting human rights implied through coverage of regulatory order and institutional accountability (NHTSA oversight). Government enforcement of safety standards. Mild-to-moderate positive signal.

Community obligation to preserve rights not directly engaged. Subject matter (vehicle regulation) is related to collective safety but does not explicitly frame duties. Limited signal.

Content does not restrict rights per UDHR. However, structural tracking and data collection practices observed on domain imply potential misuse of technology against rights protections. Mild negative signal from privacy architecture.