Investigative journalism asserting accountability for weapons trafficking. Advocacy for rule of law and institutional transparency. Editorial framing emphasizes governmental responsibility and evidentiary disclosure.

Equal human dignity implied through accountability journalism; no hierarchy of persons suggested. Cross-border investigation treats all subjects as accountable to law.

No discrimination evident in coverage. Story involves multiple nations (US, Mexico) treated equally in investigative lens. Accessible design signals non-discriminatory digital structure.

Article concerns security/weapons; life and security are implicit in investigation of illegal munitions trafficking. Limited direct commentary on personal security rights.

Not directly relevant to slavery/servitude. No observable signal either positive or negative.

No torture or cruel treatment addressed. Indirectly relevant to weapons proliferation consequences but not primary focus.

Investigative journalism asserting personhood and rights recognition through accountability mechanisms. Story implicitly affirms individuals' right to legal personality.

Equal protection advocacy core to investigation. Story documents unequal enforcement and trafficking of weapons to marginalized populations (Mexico experiencing cartel violence). Frames equality before law as violated.

Investigation itself is remedy for violation of rights. Journalism serves as effective remedy; investigative reporting demonstrates accessible legal recourse mechanism.

Arrest and detention not directly addressed. Story concerns weapons seizure, not personal arbitrary detention.

Fair trial and due process implicit in investigation of institutional accountability. Coverage demands transparency in investigation process. Public accountability through journalism ensures institutional fairness.

Investigation explicitly holds institutions accountable for unlawful conduct (weapons trafficking from US military plant). Presumes innocence while investigating institutional wrongdoing systematically.

Tracking scripts (Google Tag Manager, Fundraise Up) present; privacy not explicitly protected on-page. Story itself respects source confidentiality (characteristic of ICIJ) but structural tracking compromises visitor privacy.

Story published freely across borders; investigation involves US and Mexico. No evidence of movement restrictions. Accessibility indicates freedom to seek/receive information globally.

Investigation documents security threat (weapons trafficking) affecting asylum/refuge need for Mexican citizens. Implicitly advocates for safe harbor as consequence of institutional failure.

Nationality rights not directly addressed. Cross-border investigation treats subjects equally regardless of national origin.

Family and marriage rights not relevant to content focus.

Property rights not directly implicated. Investigation concerns government property (military ammunition) misuse but not individual property protection.

Investigative journalism itself affirms freedom of conscience/thought. Story documents institutional actions that affect conscience/belief contexts (cartel violence, security). Journalism supports pluralism.

Core signal. Freedom of expression demonstrated through investigative publication. Story seeks/receives/imparts information across borders. No apparent censorship. Journalism directly exercises and advocates for Article 19 rights.

Investigation demonstrates freedom of association through collaborative journalism (ICIJ + media partners). Story advocates for institutional accountability (peaceful assembly/association outcomes).

Journalism demands transparent governance and accountability. Story investigates institutional participation; reporting serves democratic function. Public information access affirms participation rights.

Social/cultural rights implicitly supported through advocacy for institutional accountability and rule of law. Investigation addresses security (fundamental social right).

Work and employment rights not directly addressed. No observable signal.

Rest and leisure not relevant. Indirectly relates to security/peace allowing such rights.

Investigation documents security threat affecting standard of living (cartel violence from US-origin weapons). Implicitly advocates for adequate living standards by addressing institutional failure.

Education rights not directly addressed.

Cultural participation rights not directly relevant.

Investigation demands social/international order ensuring UDHR rights. Accountability journalism directly serves this function. Cross-border investigation establishes international responsibility framework.

Story implicitly balances individual/community rights. Investigation respects institutional limits while demanding accountability. No overreach advocacy evident.

Journalism itself cannot be used to destroy UDHR rights. Investigation affirms that UDHR provisions cannot justify weapons trafficking or institutional negligence.