Article content (title/abstract) addresses aging and memory—human dignity and well-being. Scientific knowledge sharing affirms human potential. Structural paywall model undermines dignity claims.

Article topic (life sciences, aging reversal) aligned with equal dignity of all humans. No contradictory signals in content. Structural access model neutral at Article 1 level.

Non-discrimination: No observable signals regarding protection from discrimination in this article portal.

Right to life and security: Medical research topic supports right to life. Analytics/tracking slightly undermines security of privacy. Subscription model does not directly threaten personal security.

Slavery/servitude: No observable signals.

Torture/cruel treatment: No editorial content suggesting abuse. New Relic monitoring and data collection practices minor concern for bodily autonomy; accessibility gaps (no WCAG declaration) may exclude disabled users from knowledge access.

Legal personhood: No observable signals in article metadata.

Equality before law: No observable signals in provided content.

Right to effective remedy: New Relic tracking, cookies enabled, NOCACHE/NOARCHIVE directives restrict user control over data. No visible privacy/complaint mechanism on-domain. Structural data handling does not obviously support effective remedy for privacy violations.

Arbitrary arrest/detention: No observable signals.

Fair and public hearing: Peer-reviewed scientific article in established journal (Cell Press) implies editorial review process, transparency, and fair adjudication of evidence. Metadata (DOI, ISSN, citation data) supports scholarly record integrity. Subscription barrier slightly reduces public access to fair proceeding.

Presumption of innocence: Not applicable to scientific article.

Privacy and family: New Relic analytics tracking enabled (cookies active, distributed tracing). No visible privacy policy or consent management UI on-page. Page metadata includes citation/publication data but tracking cookies and analytics violate expectation of private information handling.

Freedom of movement: Scientific knowledge supports unrestricted human inquiry and movement of ideas across borders. Peer-reviewed publication affirms freedom to seek/share information. Subscription model creates jurisdictional/access barriers but does not restrict physical movement.

Asylum: Not applicable.

Nationality: Not applicable to research article.

Marriage/family: Not observable in scientific article context.

Property/ownership: Article copyright owned by Elsevier/Cell Press (not author or public). NOARCHIVE/NOCACHE robots directives restrict user archival. DRM and subscription model limit property claims of readers. TDM policy restricts text-mining reuse. Structural IP enforcement undermines right to own property (knowledge).

Freedom of thought/conscience: Not applicable to scientific content per se.

Freedom of opinion/expression: Peer-reviewed scientific article embodies freedom of expression. Full-text access restricted by paywall, but metadata and structured citation data publicly available. Editorial independence of Cell Press affirms right to express. Paywall model creates friction against universal access to expression.

Freedom of assembly/association: Scientific publishing supports scholarly community and free exchange. No editorial restrictions on assembly. Subscription model does not prohibit association. Paywall slightly limits collective participation.

Participation in government: Scientific research informs policy. No contradictory signals. Subscription access limits some participation but does not prohibit it.

Social security/economic rights: Medical/gerontology research supports right to social security and health. No restrictive editorial framing. Paywall creates economic barrier to knowledge access, slightly undermining economic opportunity.

Work and favorable conditions: Scientific authorship and publishing affirm right to work. Peer review process implies fair labor norms. No anti-labor editorial content. Structural paywall does not directly impact working conditions.

Rest and leisure: Not directly addressed in scientific article. No contradictory signals.

Health/standard of living: Gerontology/neurobiology research directly supports right to health and adequate standard of living. Content affirms dignity and well-being. Paywall restricts knowledge access, limiting health equity; commercial model may prioritize profit over universal health.

Education/development: Scientific article supports right to education and access to knowledge. Peer review affirms quality. Paywall and subscription model restrict free access to learning; no open-education signals. Accessibility gaps may exclude disabled learners.

Culture/science: Article published in world-leading journal (Cell), contributing to international scientific and cultural heritage. Content freely advances human understanding. Paywall significantly restricts participation in scientific advancement (right to share in scientific benefits). Commercial IP model undermines universal access to cultural/scientific benefits.

Social/international order: No observable signals in article metadata.

Community duties: Peer-reviewed science affirms duty to participate in community advancement. No anti-community editorial content. Paywall model reduces collective participation.

Prevention of abuse: No observable abuse-prevention signals specific to this article. Standard publisher safeguards (peer review, editorial oversight) imply commitment to preventing misuse of research.