Scientific dissemination advances human dignity and knowledge-sharing ideals (Preamble emphasis on reason and education). However, restricted paywall access limits universality. Neutral structural implementation.

Peer review and scientific discourse premise treats all contributors as equals in reasoning. Paywalled access undermines universal equality in knowledge access. Ownership structure (Elsevier) centralizes control.

Academic platform applies non-discrimination in publication criteria (merit-based peer review). Subscription model creates economic discrimination. Tracking across users without granular consent.

Behavioral tracking via New Relic, analytics collection, and third-party beacons directly observable. Nonce-protected scripts indicate security awareness but tracking persists. Right to life/security requires tracking minimization.

No observable content signals related to slavery or servitude.

No observable content signals related to torture or cruel treatment.

No observable content signals related to right to recognition before law.

Peer review and citation systems treat researchers equally before academic law. Publisher enforcement of IP/licensing creates asymmetries. Standardized DOI/ISSN metadata visible.

Authors retain intellectual property attribution (byline visible). Elsevier's ownership/licensing structure subordinates author and reader rights. Tracking infrastructure violates remedial protections.

No observable content signals related to arrest or detention.

Peer review process (implied by full-length article designation) provides fair/public hearing mechanism. Citation database creates transparent record. Paywall limits public access to proceedings.

Academic presumption of validity for peer-reviewed work. Metadata/DOI indicates legitimate publication. User privacy assumptions undermined by tracking; no explicit innocence-protection language.

New Relic tracking, analytics collection, cookie handling, and third-party beacons directly violate privacy/correspondence protections. No explicit privacy consent UI observed. Distributed tracing exposes user behavior.

Scientific community allows movement of ideas. Paywalled access restricts freedom of movement for knowledge. User data tracking binds behavior to location/IP.

Academic asylum for researchers (implicit in peer-review neutrality). International journal/publisher structure supports researcher protection. Paywall limits asylum seekers' access to knowledge.

Scientific publishing enables nationality-blind peer review. Journal metadata indicates international standards (ISSN, DOI). Paywalled access creates nationality-based economic barriers.

No observable content signals related to marriage or family.

Author/researcher property rights exist but subordinated to Elsevier ownership. User data is extracted and monetized (tracking infrastructure). No protection against arbitrary deprivation of access/privacy.

Peer review and academic standards protect freedom of thought/conscience. Scientific method enables conscience expression. Publication infrastructure supports manifest beliefs. Paywalls limit universal exercise.

Peer-reviewed journal platform directly supports freedom to seek/receive/impart information. Citation system enables knowledge sharing. Paywall model restricts information access. Tracking reduces anonymous expression.

Peer review process and academic forums enable peaceful assembly/association of researchers. Journal infrastructure supports collective knowledge-building. Publishing standards ensure non-arbitrary association.

Peer review implies equal participation in research governance. Citation indexing and DOI system enable universal access to authorship records. Paywalls undermine equal access to participation.

Academic research contributes to social/cultural rights fulfillment. Paywall restricts scientific knowledge as social entitlement. Tracking infrastructure extracts data without cultural consent.

Research work is unpaid labor in peer review (implicit social contract). Employment rights of researchers not addressed on platform. Fair wage/working conditions not guaranteed for article production.

Scientific inquiry requires rest/leisure (implicit in sustainable research culture). Paywalled access demands constant institutional subscriptions (no rest). User tracking enables 24/7 surveillance.

Scientific knowledge supports adequate standard of living. Medical/health research advances human welfare. Paywall restricts knowledge necessary for health/wellbeing. Tracking data monetization exploits user vulnerability.

Education/research platform enables education right. Peer review contributes to technical/scientific knowledge. Paywall and subscription model restrict universal education access. Tracking limits free intellectual development.

Scientific participation/cultural benefits enabled by journal infrastructure. Research dissemination is cultural participation. Paywall limits participation. Author/researcher protections exist but subordinated to publisher.

Social order supporting research dissemination is fragile without universal access. Paywalled system creates disorder in knowledge distribution. No observable rights enforcement mechanisms for users/researchers.

Community participation enabled by research platform. Duties to community enforced via peer review standards. Paywalls and tracking undermine community rights. Elsevier profit model limits altruistic obligation.

No state/group can destroy UDHR rights (including knowledge access). Paywalled platform effectively restricts UDHR exercise for economically disadvantaged. Tracking enables surveillance abuses. No nullification clause protection visible.