I started from Windows 98 and always loved the icons. They actually represented the application and purpose. These days they are more focused on looking modern. Lots of times they are not even distinguishable between each other.
Ah. Every time I look at the UI, I realize just how much the modern UI/UX degraded.
We had clear colorful icons, text labels, scrollbars, clearly distinguishable checkboxes. And now we have UI that actively promotes "rebelliousness" and "being in the know".
This is super cool! Ran into an issue though, the first time it boots perfectly, after the first refresh it loads for a bit (downloads the image again instead of from cache) and then a cachebuster URL is added and loading starts over, without ever finishing. Ideally it would just load from cache on refresh.
The long pause after "Verifying DMI Pool Data..." as the disk image downloaded aroused a dormant feeling of dread in me as I panicked and wondered why Windows wasn't loading... back in the day it meant getting yelled at for "breaking" the computer and tasked with spending the day reinstalling Windows and everybody's programs.
Nostalgia tends to make things seem better than they were. Moments like this remind me how much tech has improved over the years.
I love everything except the mouse emulation, it makes it really clunky and hard to click on anything. Any way to let me just use the normal pointer in the browser instead of a javascript abstracted one?
Very excited to see Superlogo there! As a Dutch kid I grew up with Windows 3.11 and have devoured all "Programmeren voor Kinderen" books that made me learn to love programming.
Can't help myself: whenever I see Windows 3.11, I have to compute the difference between it and Windows 3.1. So, I fire up the calculator from the Accessories folder, and compute 3.11 - 3.1. The result: 0.00. Try it! :-)
I think, I may be wrong Windows 3.11 was the last Window that provide instantaneous GUI response. Windows 95 was still fast by today's standard but it wasn't "instant".
This is the third time today I open a demo website that tells me to use Chrome. No thanks.
Score Breakdown
+0.05
PreamblePreamble
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.05
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Free public access to technology supports human dignity premise; no editorial stance observable
+0.05
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.05
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Universal free access to emulator treats all users equally; no discriminatory barriers
0.00
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No observable discrimination in product design; neutral on protections
0.00
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Right to life/security not relevant to retro emulator context
0.00
Article 4No Slavery
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No slavery or servitude present; not applicable
0.00
Article 5No Torture
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No torture or cruel treatment elements; neutral
0.00
Article 6Legal Personhood
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Right to legal personality not engaged by emulator product
0.00
Article 7Equality Before Law
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Equality before law not applicable to technical product
0.00
Article 8Right to Remedy
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Effective remedy framework not relevant to retro emulator
0.00
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Arbitrary detention not applicable
0.00
Article 10Fair Hearing
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Fair trial rights not engaged
0.00
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Criminalization framework not applicable
-0.15
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.15
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
User-select disabled and touch-callout prevention suggests monitoring/control of user input; third-party integrations (featurebase) may collect usage data
+0.10
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.10
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Free access enables circulation of retro technology knowledge; no geographic restrictions visible
+0.10
Article 14Asylum
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.10
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Public accessibility supports asylum/refuge concept by offering universal access; no nationality requirement
0.00
Article 15Nationality
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Nationality rights not applicable to technical product
0.00
Article 16Marriage & Family
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Marriage/family rights not engaged
-0.20
Article 17Property
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Third-party tracking integrations (featurebase, levelsio attribution) and input monitoring suggest property/privacy risk; no visible data handling policy
0.00
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Freedom of conscience/religion not directly engaged; neutral
+0.05
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Practice Advocacy
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Free public platform enables expression via retro computing interface; however, user-select disabled and accessibility barriers reduce effective speech participation; global free access is positive
+0.05
Article 20Assembly & Association
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.05
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Public product supports peaceful assembly concept; no restrictions on access or use observable
0.00
Article 21Political Participation
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Democratic participation not engaged by technical product
0.00
Article 22Social Security
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Social security framework not applicable
0.00
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Employment rights not directly engaged; product is entertainment, not labor
0.00
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Rest/leisure rights not explicitly addressed; product enables leisure use
0.00
Article 25Standard of Living
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Health/standard of living not directly relevant
+0.15
Article 26Education
Medium Practice Advocacy
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.15
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Free access to retro computing emulator supports education and cultural heritage preservation; promotes equal access to technological knowledge across socioeconomic boundaries
-0.25
Article 27Cultural Participation
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.10
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Product participates in cultural heritage (Windows 3.11 nostalgia) but accessibility barriers (user-select disabled, retro interface) limit participation for users with disabilities or non-visual browsing needs
0.00
Article 28Social & International Order
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Social/international order framework not directly applicable
0.00
Article 29Duties to Community
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Duties and limitations framework not explicitly engaged
+0.05
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.05
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No observable attempts to destroy UDHR rights through product design; neutral-to-mild positive on non-restriction principle