This feels like a classic business blunder. Focus hard on a single business segment, leaving an opening in the market for your competitors. Not because it wasn't profitable, but because it wasn't profitable enough for you, right now. Only downside is that now you've created an opening for a new player in the market.
This feels like a short coming of western business/stock market thinking. Focusing on profit within the next few quarters, and not caring about the longer term consequences. For all it's flaws and shady business practises at least China can think beyond a single fiscal year.
As a outside observer, NAND and DRAM prices have skyrocket ed with the AI infrastructure boom just as the China-based fabs are coming online.
It is wise for these Chinese fabs to eventually use a very aggressive dumping strategy to price well below cost push out other players forever, especially in DRAM.
But right now it seems they can max out their supply capacity without selling below cost.
Appears to me like China's endless state led (often unproductive) investment in semiconductor manufacturing subsidies (for decades) is about to pay off with some industry dominance soon.
DDR4 going from $1.35 to $11.50 in a year shows this market was already distorted before CXMT showed up.
Legacy DRAM is still over half of Samsung and SK hynix's production capacity. That's where the volume pain actually lands while they're betting everything on HBM4.
Has DDR5 caught up to DDR4 latency yet? I remember it was worse at least in the beginning. There's more bandwidth per channel but a hw design can always add more channels for the desired BW. Not so for latency.
Is there a reason GPU's don't use insane "blocks" of sdcard slots (for massively parallel io) so the model weights don't need to pass through a limited PCI bus?
That explains the cheap DDR4 DIMMs on AliExpress. Can get 2x 16GB DDR4-3200 DIMMs for A$252 delivered to Australia. A local PC store has same spec “name brand” RAM for around $380-$400.
I was wondering when people would find out about CXMT. I wish them luck and hope the US doesn't sabotage them. We need diversity and competition right now.
> CXMT is in the process of converting wafer capacity equivalent to about 20 percent of its total DRAM output — some 60,000 wafers per month — at its Shanghai plant to the fourth-generation HBM3 chip production
Apple has planned to explore cooperation with Chinese memory chip manufacturers Yangtze Storage (YMTC) and Changxin Storage (CXMT) to strive for more favorable supply contracts [from the big three]
Back in the 1990’s everyone had to have a unix workstation for unclear reasons (why not run Linux for < 10% the cost?).
There were crazy bubble economics schemes that meant doomed startups got unix boxes for free.
When the bubble popped, the workstation vendors hit a triple whammy: Inferior $/perf, unlimited used inventory at low prices, and an economic downturn.
The same exact thing is happening now, except the hardware is being jammed into data center models.
Anyway, when the bubble pops, people making affordable consumer stuff will be fine (like this CXMT company).
People that went all-in on firing all non-hyperscaler customers (like micron/crucial) will find they’re building the wrong chips for end-user devices, there is no server market anymore (for a few years), and they have a total addressable market of maybe 1000 distressed companies, globally.
I predict the people making these decisions and destroying their companies to juice Q2 2026 financial outlook numbers will genuinely be surprised when the bankruptcies start.
Everyone here wants to be able to buy RAM at a reasonable price again.
After reading articles about CXMT and repeatedly reviewing the comments here - my take is there's nothing in play that will lead to reasonably priced RAM anytime soon.
If I'm wrong please illuminate us. We could use some hope.
Article addresses technological competition affecting human economic interests and justice in information markets; mild positive framing toward human welfare
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
No observable signals regarding equal rights and dignity among humans
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
No observable signals regarding discrimination or enumerated protected characteristics
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
No observable signals regarding right to life, liberty, security
ND
Article 4No Slavery
No observable signals regarding slavery or servitude
ND
Article 5No Torture
No observable signals regarding torture or inhuman treatment
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
No observable signals regarding right to legal personhood
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
No observable signals regarding equal protection before law
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
No observable signals regarding remedies for rights violations
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
No observable signals regarding arbitrary arrest or detention
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
No observable signals regarding fair and public hearing or trial
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
No observable signals regarding presumption of innocence or retroactive criminal law
ND
Article 12Privacy
No observable signals regarding privacy, family, home, or correspondence
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
No observable signals regarding freedom of movement
ND
Article 14Asylum
No observable signals regarding asylum or nationality
ND
Article 15Nationality
No observable signals regarding right to nationality
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
No observable signals regarding marriage and family
ND
Article 17Property
No observable signals regarding property ownership
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
No observable signals regarding freedom of thought, conscience, or religion
+0.23
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium A:free-expression-journalistic P:access-restricted-paywall
Editorial
+0.35
Structural
-0.15
SETL
+0.42
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial: News publication inherently advocates for freedom of opinion and information. Structural: Subscription wall and login requirements create mild barriers to universal information access; tension between journalistic mission and access restrictions
Article addresses technology sector competition and industrial organization; tangential to assembly and association; mild positive framing of competitive enterprise
ND
Article 21Political Participation
No observable signals regarding political participation or universal suffrage
ND
Article 22Social Security
No observable signals regarding social security or cultural rights
Article covers semiconductor industry competition and manufacturing capacity; touches indirectly on employment and work in technology sector; mild positive framing of economic activity
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
No observable signals regarding rest, leisure, or reasonable working hours
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
No observable signals regarding adequate standard of living, healthcare, or social services
ND
Article 26Education
No observable signals regarding education or access to learning
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
No observable signals regarding cultural participation or intellectual property
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
No observable signals regarding social and international order
ND
Article 29Duties to Community
No observable signals regarding duties to community
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
No observable signals regarding prohibition of rights destruction