No privacy policy or statement directly observable on provided content.
Terms of Service
—
No terms of service observable on provided content.
Accessibility
—
Content includes structured data and responsive design signals; accessibility features not directly verifiable from provided snippet.
Mission
+0.05
Article 19 Article 20
Domain appears to focus on technical writing and infrastructure discussion. Blog-format editorial suggests commitment to information sharing and discourse, mildly positive for freedom of expression.
Editorial Code
—
No explicit editorial guidelines or code observable.
Ownership
—
Author identified as 'Robert' with profile URL; no corporate ownership signals suggesting structural bias.
Access Model
+0.08
Article 19 Article 25
Content appears freely accessible; no paywall detected. Supports open access to information.
Ad/Tracking
-0.05
Article 3 Article 12
Plausible Analytics (privacy-friendly) mentioned as self-hosted tool, but standard web tracking likely present. Modest negative for potential data collection.
I’ve found Scaleway really good, I’m surprised it doesn’t come up more often here.
If it matters, I didn’t go to them because they were specifically an EU org either - when Packet became Equinix Metal and then that got shut down, SCW were the most equivalent in terms of cost / hardware specifications and I often used them in parallel when Packet was still around so as to not have all my eggs in one basket.
Domain TLD is the one administratively completely entangled into USA system while playing a major role on the internet working as it does. ICANN should definitely be an international entity, like UNESCO.
Hetzner was something I already used, so I just doubled down. I have a single OVH instance where I ma playing with Openclaw, but that was because I was having issues with Hetzner that day on their new instance page (was fixed the next day)
I use Bunny for my CDN, I just wish they have the capabilityt to route IPv4 and IPv6 traffic to IPv6 only origins. If your origin doesn't have IPv4, it wont route IPv4 to an IPv6 origin. Something Cloudflare could do. Still a shame its not a high priority.
For Domains, I am still on porkbun, but i have like 20 domains, and moving them to EU registrars would be pricey. I will do it, just not looking forward to it. Also there are few registrars tht handle all the TLDs i have, nothing like Porkbun. I use dot.bs to optimize my registrars and keep track of them.
I self-host a lot, but I haven't done github. I have a Forgejo instance with working CI/CD, but there are some painpoints mirroring 100s of repos and updating PATs. Also I minimize how much critical infra I host. I do it as my day job. Don't want to do it so much at home, and I still do some between NAS and self-hosted services I do run.
I do plan to try out Hanko and Nebius, those sound good. and Hit up scaleway to see if there is stuff I want to use there. I know Scaleway can be pricey.
Good, honest write up! As users we need to make more efforts to move out of the American ecosystems. Cloudflare is just so convenient to take only one example.
OT, about the finished product (hank.parts): the French translation and tone is a little rude. For one, it uses "tu" instead of "vous", which does have become customary on Social networks but is still a little bit agressive on a regular website. And "bagnole" or "balance une photo" is more than casual.
Maybe the target are young people but I wouldn't bet on it. Average car ownership in Europe is 53, and 55 in France. Share of new vehicle registrations by adults aged 18-34 is below 10% in Europe.
* Scaleway is totally painful/scary on data encryption at rest and in transit, does not feel like your infra/data is isolated from other customers
* OVHCloud is good if you deploy your production in HA fashion with higher tiers or do multi-region yourself using a vRack, real issue that they made the news with burning DCs, the fact that the customer base has been originally a gazillion cheap web servers does not help big companies going in, they are going somewhere on the SaaS
On most European cloud providers I feel like IAM is crap: workload identity is almost non-existent, API keys management is usually hellish. Same goes for encryption/isolation. I want to hear more technical feedback on most of them, devil is in the details !
Here in Norway (and probably Sweden, too) BankID is a widely used authentication system, and most domestic services will use that as a auth / login. Only "drawback" is that it requires 2FA, which is quite trivial today. But there are still tons of users that want their "login with FB / Google / etc.".
And a last but: If using such auth systems, one would have to account for all the different systems unique to countries.
Maybe some larger EU-specific ID / auth system would make sense?
> Your users expect "Sign in with Google" and "Sign in with Apple."
You can add email/password and passkeys, but removing social logins entirely is a conversion killer.
I know this is true, but I genuinely don't understand it. I want email/password and passkey, I will always go out of my way to avoid "Sign in with ...". I just don't get why people love this.
I tried buying a domain on OVH and the experience was shitty was forwarded between different versions of the page GB etc and could not finish the checkout
Thank you for this. I'm in Europe with an established SaaS that's been running in production for years and I've converged on a similar stack (OVHCloud instead of Hetzner). However, I've realized you can stay sovereign and independent in any jurisdiction (not just Europe) just by simplifying your stack and running a few baremetal servers in-house.
Just buy a few Mac Studios and run them in-house with power supply backup and networking redundancy and you're good to go to serve more than 10k - 100k requests/second which is good enough to serve a million customers. You don't need VMs: a single Mac Studio gets you 2–4x the power of m7i.2xlarge on AWS, and pays for itself within a few months of AWS bills. You can do local AI inference and get Claude Opus-level performance (Kimi K2.5) over a cluster of Mac Studios with Exo.Labs (an unofficial Apple partner). You get free S3-compatible object storage with zero ongoing storage costs with MinIO (yes it's redundant even if you lose a server, and your hosting provider can't hold your data hostage by charging for egress). Postgres runs like a beast and is incredibly easy to setup - you get zero latency DB because it runs on the same machine, has access to lots of RAM and you're not paying per-GB or per-core. Managed databases are a scam. You don't need an Auth provider, just do passkeys yourself. And the great thing about Apple Silicon hardware is that it is amazingly quiet, reliable, and efficient - you can do thing like run headless browsers 3x faster and cheaper than on standard server hardware because of the unified memory and GPU acceleration, so you're not paying for CI/CD compute by-the-minute or headless browsers either.
This entire stack could give you computing power equivalent to a 25k euro/month AWS bill for the cost of electricity (same electricity cost as running a few fridges 24/7) plus about 50k euros one-time to set it up (about 4 Mac Studios). And yes, it's redundant, scalable, and even faster (in terms of per-request latency) than standard AWS/GCP cloud bloat. Not only is it cheaper and you own everything, but your app will work faster because all services are local (DB, Redis cache, SSD, etc.) without any VM overhead, shared cores, or noisy neighbours.
> Google Ads and Apple's Developer Program. If you want to acquire users and distribute a mobile app, you're paying the toll to Mountain View and Cupertino.
If you said Play Store, then sure, though at least distribution on there is free. But you said Google Ads, which you really do not need to acquire users. Returns on Google Ads were already low, and have only continued getting worse and worse. I'm sure someone here claims to be a magician at it and believes they can get a fantastic RoI out of it, and I'm sure some can. But the huge majority doesn't. It's very much like day trading stocks.
There's a huge number of other, better avenues for paid marketing if you want to do it.
For anyone looking for non-US transactional email, I found https://mailpace.com via HN a while back and can recommend. Can't remember who the HN user behind it is, but they've done a great job.
All of those considerations are driven by politics, not technical matters. What if in Germany next election will be won by AfD, in France by Lepenists (Jordan Bardella is going for the win in 2027 election). And next US election will be won by Democrats. What's then? Moving back to the USA?
Its a really good sign that this worked out at all. And the takeaways are enlightening
- EU domain registrars might have some bullshit under the hood making the same TLDs more expensive. Might need to investigate
- eu needs its own mobile app ecosystem, easy auth, and genAI offerings
- - but interested to see why mistral wasnt feasible
- other things need to be scaled up to have the community and maturity to function well. This come with time and adoption
Id love if this took off. If more and more people did this
Super timely - thank you! Im in the process of moving the entire stack of my SaaS* fully in EU as well. Hetzner bare-metal, Talos k8s, OVH Object Storage for backups, self-hosted (for now) image repo. For now im still on Cloudflare for CDN, but bunny looks interesting. Using GitOps (FluxCD) as deployment strategy enables no dependencies on e.g. GitHub Actions.
For one thing running on bare-metal @ Hetzner is insane value for money versus GCP GKE. Im a third of the running costs and get ~50x resources.
The only aspect im struggling with is full-disk encryption. Although customer data is still encrypred with envelope encryption in the database, i want to migrate to fully encrypted disks (LUKS + TPM) sooner rather than later. If anyone has any resources and/or experience with this, please let know :)
I've built gethly.com entirely on my own VPSs, so i was concerned only with VPS providers. People actually might not know that Europe has orders of magnitude more developed IT infrastructure than USA, or China(Asia is actually quite a joke). For every one VPS provider in North America, Europe has 10. Not only that but there are all necessary services one might need - cdn, domains, dns, storage, payments... nothing is missing. I don't see why people think they "need" american companies, except the big three of cloud providers with their gazillion useless services. But 99% of projects don't really need cloud services at all.
Truth be told if you're a European business, U.S. cloud providers weren't a good deal for a long time. Not since the advent of NVMe's and cheap 100G NIC's, well, that's for sure. Let's have a look at AWS R8 class, which is their most recent native instance type with real, modern I/O. Now, these are ostensibly powered by AWS Nitro 6th-gen networking, which is a 600G NIC. However, if you fancy NVMe drives (R8gd) which you do normally, you won't be getting more than 50G full-duplex. If you want to hit 100G+, you will need R8gn instances which don't offer ANY storage. So if your idea of data engineering is not calling from the 90s, well, you're stuck between a rock and a hard place mate!
Good news is you can get PCIe 5.0 servers, I/O gear, and host it yourself for a mere fraction of semi-capable AWS bill.
Bad news it doesn't matter if you don't get enough uplink bandwidth, no control over the routing table in the core routing infrastructure leading up to your WAN, or actual routers capable of hardware-filtering 100 gigabits worth of line rate per link. And you will need all these things if you want to at least try and match what Cloudflare/Cloudfront is doing from routing standpoint. (It will be much harder though to match them from the CDN standpoint...) DDoS protection is overrated, but it's not for reasons people commonly think.
Score Breakdown
+0.16
PreamblePreamble
Medium F:data_sovereignty A:european_infrastructure F:choice_and_agency
Editorial
+0.15
Structural
+0.10
SETL
+0.09
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Author advocates for human choice and agency in infrastructure decisions. Frames EU infrastructure as enabler of autonomy and data control. Positive lean toward dignity and self-determination principles underlying UDHR.
+0.18
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium A:equal_access F:european_alternatives
Editorial
+0.20
Structural
+0.10
SETL
+0.14
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Advocates for equal access to infrastructure services without dependency on single jurisdiction. Acknowledges inherent friction but frames it as solvable through choice, supporting equal dignity in technical autonomy.
+0.10
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low F:non_discrimination P:provider_selection
Editorial
+0.10
Structural
+0.08
SETL
+0.04
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Does not address discrimination directly. Implicit signal: author selects providers based on capability and values rather than demographic markers, mild structural positive.
+0.23
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
High A:data_residency F:autonomy P:self_hosting
Editorial
+0.25
Structural
+0.18
SETL
+0.13
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Strong advocacy for right to life/liberty through data control and infrastructure autonomy. Self-hosting approach maximizes individual control over personal systems. Clear positive signal for security of person and digital integrity.
-0.03
Article 4No Slavery
Low
Editorial
-0.05
Structural
0.00
SETL
-0.05
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No slavery or servitude discussion. Content is technically neutral on this article.
-0.03
Article 5No Torture
Low
Editorial
-0.05
Structural
0.00
SETL
-0.05
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No torture or degrading treatment discussion. Technically neutral.
+0.10
Article 6Legal Personhood
Low F:legal_personhood P:documented_identity
Editorial
+0.10
Structural
+0.08
SETL
+0.04
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Hanko authentication service mentioned, providing identity and user management. Supports recognition before law through documented digital identity.
+0.16
Article 7Equality Before Law
Medium F:equal_protection A:european_law_preference
Editorial
+0.15
Structural
+0.12
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Author explicitly states GDPR simplicity as motivation. Preference for EU legal framework reflects trust in equal protection under law. Structural signal through service selection aligns with rights-protective jurisdictions.
+0.25
Article 8Right to Remedy
High A:privacy_protection F:data_residency P:encryption
Editorial
+0.25
Structural
+0.20
SETL
+0.11
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Strong focus on privacy rights. Data residency, encrypted email (Tutanota), privacy-friendly analytics (Plausible), secrets management (Infisical), and self-hosting all demonstrate commitment to protecting private life and correspondence.
-0.03
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Low
Editorial
-0.05
Structural
0.00
SETL
-0.05
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No discussion of freedom of movement or association relevant to this article.
+0.12
Article 10Fair Hearing
Medium P:community_knowledge F:transparency
Editorial
+0.12
Structural
+0.10
SETL
+0.05
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Author emphasizes thinner documentation and community knowledge in EU alternatives, framing this as a challenge. Implicit acknowledgment of right to fair, public hearing and access to justice through information transparency.
+0.08
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Low F:presumption P:documented_systems
Editorial
+0.08
Structural
+0.06
SETL
+0.04
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Not directly addressed. Self-hosting and documented infrastructure support accountability, mild positive.
+0.28
Article 12Privacy
High A:privacy_by_design F:data_protection P:encrypted_systems
Editorial
+0.28
Structural
+0.25
SETL
+0.09
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Extensive discussion of privacy protections: encrypted email, self-hosted infrastructure, data residency, privacy-friendly analytics. Multiple structural choices (Tutanota, Plausible, self-hosting) designed to protect private life, family, home, and correspondence.
-0.03
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Low
Editorial
-0.05
Structural
0.00
SETL
-0.05
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No discussion of freedom of movement within or outside territories.
-0.03
Article 14Asylum
Low
Editorial
-0.05
Structural
0.00
SETL
-0.05
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No discussion of asylum or refugee rights.
+0.10
Article 15Nationality
Low F:nationality P:jurisdiction_choice
Editorial
+0.10
Structural
+0.08
SETL
+0.04
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Implicit signal: choice of EU providers and data residency reflects respect for national jurisdiction and legal framework alignment. Mild positive.
+0.12
Article 16Marriage & Family
Medium A:privacy_protection F:family_data_security
Editorial
+0.12
Structural
+0.10
SETL
+0.05
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Emphasis on data residency and encryption protects family privacy. Author does not discuss children specifically, but infrastructure choices reflect protection of private and family life.
+0.20
Article 17Property
Medium A:data_ownership F:property_rights P:self_hosting
Editorial
+0.20
Structural
+0.18
SETL
+0.06
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Self-hosting philosophy directly reflects right to own property. Author explicitly states data stays where they put it, avoiding provider acquisition drama. Demonstrates commitment to property rights in digital context.
+0.08
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Low P:provider_choice F:autonomy
Editorial
+0.08
Structural
+0.06
SETL
+0.04
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Implicit support for freedom of thought, conscience, religion through infrastructure autonomy and choice. No explicit discussion.
+0.34
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High A:freedom_of_expression F:open_platform P:self_hosting C:technical_discussion
Editorial
+0.35
Structural
+0.28
SETL
+0.16
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Strong positive: Article advocates for own blog/platform independence. Gitea (self-hosted git) and general self-hosting philosophy support freedom to receive and impart information without interference. Published thought-piece demonstrates commitment to expression.
+0.19
Article 20Assembly & Association
Medium A:peaceful_assembly F:community_participation P:open_ecosystem
Editorial
+0.20
Structural
+0.15
SETL
+0.10
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Self-hosting and open infrastructure choices support freedom of peaceful assembly and association. Emphasis on community (though smaller EU communities noted) reflects value placed on collective participation in technology decisions.
+0.15
Article 21Political Participation
Medium F:democratic_choice A:governance_participation
Editorial
+0.15
Structural
+0.12
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Author's choice to participate in EU infrastructure ecosystem reflects engagement with democratic governance preferences. Emphasis on 'actively making' choices supports right to take part in public affairs.
+0.10
Article 22Social Security
Low P:social_services F:dignity
Editorial
+0.10
Structural
+0.08
SETL
+0.04
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Not directly addressed. Self-hosting and infrastructure choice may indirectly support human dignity and development through technological autonomy.
+0.18
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Medium A:labor_choice F:fair_work P:pricing
Editorial
+0.18
Structural
+0.15
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Author explicitly notes Hetzner pricing is 'absurdly good compared to AWS' and lower infrastructure costs overall. Supports fair choice of employment through economical access to tools. Bunny.net dashboard praised, supporting dignity of work.
+0.05
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Low P:rest_and_leisure
Editorial
+0.05
Structural
+0.04
SETL
+0.02
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Mentions UptimeRobot for monitoring 'so I can sleep,' supporting right to rest and leisure through automation. Minor positive signal.
+0.23
Article 25Standard of Living
High A:standard_of_living F:economic_sufficiency P:cost_optimization C:accessibility
Editorial
+0.22
Structural
+0.20
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Strong positive on standard of living and economic access. Author repeatedly emphasizes cost savings, accessibility of EU infrastructure, and democratization of technical capability. Supports right to adequate standard of living through economical tooling.
+0.15
Article 26Education
Medium A:education F:knowledge_sharing P:open_documentation
Editorial
+0.15
Structural
+0.12
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Published article serves educational function. Emphasis on documentation gap (thinner docs in EU ecosystem) reflects value placed on education and information access. Demonstrates commitment to sharing technical knowledge.
+0.19
Article 27Cultural Participation
Medium A:cultural_participation F:technology_access P:open_infrastructure
Editorial
+0.20
Structural
+0.15
SETL
+0.10
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Supporting open EU infrastructure ecosystem supports cultural participation and access to benefits of scientific/technical progress. Open-source tools mentioned (Rancher, Gitea) support shared cultural/technical heritage.
+0.26
Article 28Social & International Order
High A:social_order F:rights_framework P:legal_jurisdiction C:gdpr_compliance
Editorial
+0.25
Structural
+0.22
SETL
+0.09
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Explicitly frames choice of EU infrastructure in terms of GDPR and legal framework. Author demonstrates commitment to social order protecting rights listed in UDHR through infrastructure alignment with EU legal protections.
+0.18
Article 29Duties to Community
Medium A:responsibility F:community_contribution P:ecosystem_support
Editorial
+0.18
Structural
+0.15
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Author states 'EU infrastructure companies deserve the traffic' and directs users to European providers, demonstrating duties to community. Acknowledges trade-offs and costs of choices, showing responsibility awareness.
+0.10
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Low F:no_destruction P:preservation
Editorial
+0.10
Structural
+0.08
SETL
+0.04
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Not directly addressed. Implicit signal: self-hosting and data sovereignty support preservation of individual rights against institutional encroachment. Mild positive.