Content advocates for recognition of human dignity and equal capacity ('you're all smart and competent people'), rejection of hierarchical narratives, and self-determination. Structural elements (free access, no tracking) support this mildly. Preamble emphasis on equality and freedom implicitly supported.

Explicitly rejects external assignment of life paths; argues all individuals equally capable of self-determination regardless of background or prestige signals. 'You're all smart and competent people' affirms equal dignity.

Critiques systems that discriminate based on conformity to specific prestige markers ('what's legible to one scene might seem ridiculous to another'). Argues status systems are arbitrary, not based on inherent worth.

No direct engagement with right to life observable.

Obliquely addresses unfreedom: 'many undergrads are stuck in flatland...never explicitly make the choice to inhabit that particular plane.' Critique of manufactured consent and absence of genuine choice is implied.

No observable engagement with torture or cruel treatment.

No observable engagement with right to recognition as person before law.

'Profoundly asymmetric market: confused undergraduates vs. corporate juggernauts with nine-figure budgets.' Describes unequal application of power and recruitment manipulation targeting vulnerable populations. Implicit argument for equal protection.

No observable engagement with right to legal remedy.

No observable engagement with arbitrary arrest/detention.

No observable engagement with fair trial procedures.

No observable engagement with criminal liability or retroactive law.

Implicit engagement: critique of 'legibility' systems as forms of social surveillance. 'Step outside the plane and you become illegible' describes monitoring of conformity, though not explicitly framed as privacy violation.

Minimal engagement with freedom of movement. Metaphorical 'flatland' and 'planes' may obliquely reference constraint, but not directly about physical movement.

Addresses institutional systems that 'heavily discourage' alternatives and create environments where vulnerable populations (confused undergrads) cannot safely choose. 'Beware of old people with money who want to use you as a missile' frames institutional power as potentially oppressive.

No explicit engagement with nationality rights.

No observable engagement with marriage and family rights.

Minimal observable engagement with property rights. No relevant content noted.

Directly addresses freedom of thought: 'easy to absorb one of these narratives and mistake it for your own beliefs.' Entire argument centers on distinguishing authentic internal conviction from externally-imposed desire. Advocates explicitly for examining 'what motivates you' and rejecting unexamined adoption of values.

Author explicitly exercises freedom of expression through critical essay. Advocates for information-seeking ('try to grok as many planes as possible') and dialogue ('talk to people outside your bubble'). Content freely accessible. Satirical marking shows editorial integrity.

Implicit critique of how 'scenes' manufacture group identity and conformity. Advocates for associating across multiple communities ('appearing legible to lots of different planes at once') rather than singular group membership.

Implicit engagement: critiques institutional authority ('Institutions') as coercive rather than legitimate. 'There is no such thing as a free lunch' suggests questioning of hidden coercion in purportedly neutral systems. Does not directly address democratic participation.

Advocates for capacity to pursue meaningful life: 'figuring out what's actually meaningful to you and pursuing it.' Career diversity framed as enabling human flourishing. Does not directly address social safety nets but promotes conditions for self-actualization.

Central topic: right to freely choose career path without manipulation. 'Make sure this is truly a decision that's good for you, not just for the company' directly addresses employment choice. 'Don't sell your soul...without understanding the full terms of the contract' emphasizes informed consent.

Minimal engagement with rest and leisure. Brief mention of 'university life is busy enough as it is' but not substantive engagement.

Implicit: argues that artificially-constructed prestige hierarchies ('planes of legibility') create false scarcity and prevent access to meaningful opportunities. 'Try lots of things...even if it seems illegible or unprestigious' advocates for alternatives to prestige-driven consumption of education.

Entire essay is educational intervention toward human development. Advocates for autonomous thinking ('don't sell your soul...without understanding'), intellectual exploration ('try lots of things'), and capacity to evaluate institutional narratives. Free access to content supports educational right.

Minimal engagement with cultural participation. Brief mention of 'going to random talks and societies' but not substantive engagement with cultural/artistic rights.

Challenges institutional legitimacy: argues social order (planes of legibility) constrains rather than enables human rights. 'Beware of Institutions' and 'not all battles' suggest awareness that institutional order may not serve human flourishing.

Implies social responsibility: 'beware of old people with money who want to use you as a missile' suggests duties not to be instrumentalized. 'Be a pragmatic idealist' advocates for balancing individual flourishing with broader good. Does not substantively develop duties component.

Minimal engagement with right to destroy human rights. No observable content on this article.