H
HN HRCB top | articles | domains | dashboard | models | factions | about | exp
home / openai.com / item 45427982
-0.17 Sora 2 (openai.com)
905 points by skilled 148 days ago | 878 comments on HN | Mild negative Product · v3.7 ·
Summary Digital Access & Privacy Neutral
Page content is not accessible due to JavaScript and cookie requirements, preventing substantive evaluation of the Sora 2 product announcement against UDHR provisions. Observable structural signals show mild negative directionality toward digital access and privacy rights through access barriers and data collection requirements.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: ND — Preamble Preamble: No Data — Preamble P Article 1: ND — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Article 1: No Data — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: -0.20 — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: ND — Equality Before Law Article 7: No Data — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: ND — Privacy Article 12: No Data — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: ND — Property Article 17: No Data — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: -0.15 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: ND — Assembly & Association Article 20: No Data — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: ND — Political Participation Article 21: No Data — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: ND — Work & Equal Pay Article 23: No Data — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: ND — Standard of Living Article 25: No Data — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: ND — Education Article 26: No Data — Education 26 Article 27: ND — Cultural Participation Article 27: No Data — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: ND — Social & International Order Article 28: No Data — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: ND — Duties to Community Article 29: No Data — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
Weighted Mean -0.17 Unweighted Mean -0.17
Max -0.15 Article 19 Min -0.20 Article 3
Signal 2 No Data 29
Confidence 1% Volatility 0.03 (Low)
Negative 2 Channels E: 0.5 S: 0.5
SETL ND
FW Ratio 60% 3 facts · 2 inferences
Evidence: High: 0 Medium: 0 Low: 2 No Data: 29
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.00 (0 articles) Security: -0.20 (1 articles) Legal: 0.00 (0 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.00 (0 articles) Personal: 0.00 (0 articles) Expression: -0.15 (1 articles) Economic & Social: 0.00 (0 articles) Cultural: 0.00 (0 articles) Order & Duties: 0.00 (0 articles)
HN Discussion 20 top-level · 30 replies
kveykva 2025-09-30 17:11 UTC link
The example prompt "intense anime battle between a boy with a sword made of blue fire and an evil demon demon" is super clearly just replicating Blue Exorcist https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Exorcist
minimaxir 2025-09-30 17:14 UTC link
OpenAI apparently assumes that the primary users of Sora 2/the Sora app will be Gen Z, especially with the demo examples shown in the livestream. If they are trying to pull users from TikTok with this, it won't work: there's some nuance to Gen Z interests than being quirky and random, and if they did indeed pull users from TikTok then ByteDance could easily include their own image/video generators.

Sora 2 itself as a video model doesn't seem better than Veo 3/Kling 2.5/Wan 2.2, and the primary touted feature of having a consistent character can be sufficiently emulated in those models with an input image.

rushingcreek 2025-09-30 17:20 UTC link
The most interesting thing by far is the ability to include video clips of people and products as a part of the prompt and then create a realistic video with that metadata. On the technical side, I'm guessing they've just trained the model to conditionally generate videos based on predetermined characters -- it's likely more of a data innovation than anything architectural. However, as a user, the feature is very cool and will likely make Sora 2 very useful commercially.

However, I still don't see how OpenAI beats Google in video generation. As this was likely a data innovation, Google can replicate and improve this with their ownership of YouTube. I'd be surprised if they didn't already have something like this internally.

mempko 2025-09-30 17:26 UTC link
It's obvious there is no way OpenAI can keep videos generated by this within their ecosystem. Everything will be fake, nothing real. We are going to have to change the way we interact with video. While it's obviously possible to fake videos today, it takes work by the creator and takes skill. Now it will take no skill so the obvious consequence of this is we can't believe anything we see.

The worst part is we are already seeing bad actors saying 'I didn't say that' or 'I didn't do that, it was a deep fake'. Now you will be able to say anything in real life and use AI for plausible deniability.

simonw 2025-09-30 17:40 UTC link
Anyone with access able to confirm if you can start this with a still image and a prompt?

The recent Google Veo 3 paper "Video models are zero-shot learners and reasoners" made a fascinating argument for video generation models as multi-purpose computer vision tools in the same way that LLMs are multi-purpose NLP tools. https://video-zero-shot.github.io/

It includes a bunch of interesting prompting examples in the appendix, it would be interesting to see how those work against Sora 2.

I wrote some notes on that paper here: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Sep/27/video-models-are-zero-...

gorgoiler 2025-09-30 17:55 UTC link
Impressively high level of continuity. The only errors I could really call out are:

1/ 0m23s: The moon polo players begin with the red coat rider putting on a pair of gloves, but they are not wearing gloves in the left-vs-right charge-down.

2/ 1m05s: The dragon flies up the coast with the cliffs on one side, but then the close-up has the direction of flight reversed. Also, the person speaking seemingly has their back to the direction of flight. (And a stripy instead of plain shirt and a harness that wasn’t visible before.)

3/ 1m45s: The ducks aren't taking the right hand corner into the straightaway. They are heading into the wall.

I do wonder what the workflow will be for fixing any more challenging continuity errors.

willahmad 2025-09-30 18:01 UTC link
I wonder about the implications of this tech.

State of the things with doom scrolling was already bad, add to it layoffs and replacing people with AI (just admit it, interns are struggling competing with Claude Code, Cursor and Codex)

What's coming next? Bunch of people, with lots of free time watching non-sense AI generated content?

I am genuinely curious, because I was and still excited about AI, until I saw how doom scrolling is getting worse

adidoit 2025-09-30 18:07 UTC link
Impressive tech. Don't love the likely societal implications.
simonw 2025-09-30 18:13 UTC link
The main lesson I learned from the March ChatGPT image generation launch - which signed up 100 million new users in the first week - is that people love being able to generate images of their friends and family (and pets).

I expect the "cameo" feature is an attempt at capturing that viral magic a second time.

haolez 2025-09-30 18:52 UTC link
One use that occurred to me is that fans will be able to "fix" some movies that dropped the ball.

For example, I saw a lot of people criticizing "Wish" (2023, Disney) for being a good movie in the first half, and totally dropping the ball in the last half. I haven't seen it yet, but I'm wondering if fans will be able to evolve the source material in the future to get the best possible version of it.

Maybe we will even get a good closure for Lost (2004)!

(I'm ignoring copyright aspects, of course, because those are too boring :D)

saguntum 2025-09-30 19:15 UTC link
I wonder if they're going to license this to brands for heavily personalized advertisement. Imagine being able to see videos of yourself wearing clothes you're buying online before you actually place the order, instead of viewing them on a model.

If they got the generation "live" enough, imagine walking past a mirror in a department store and seeing yourself in different clothes.

Wild times.

SeanAnderson 2025-09-30 19:24 UTC link
Sheeeeeeeeeeesh. That was so impressive. I had to go back to the start and confirm it said "Everything you're about to see is Sora 2" when I saw Sam do that intro. I thought there was a prologue that was native film before getting to the generated content.
the_duke 2025-09-30 19:37 UTC link
I haven't seen comments regarding a big factor here:

It seems like OpenAI is trying to turn Sora into a social network - TikTok but AI.

The webapp is heavily geared towards consumption, with a feed as the entry point, liking and commenting for posts, and user profiles having a prominent role.

The creation aspect seems about as important as on Instagram, TikTok etc - easily available, but not the primary focus.

Generated videos are very short, with minimal controls. The only selectable option is picking between landscape and portrait mode.

There is no mention or attempt to move towards long form videos, storylines, advanced editing/controls/etc, like others in this space (eg Google Flow).

Seems like they want to turn this into AITok.

Edit: regarding accurate physics ... check out these two videos below...

To be fair, Veo fails miserably with those prompts also.

https://sora.chatgpt.com/p/s_68dc32c7ddb081919e0f38d8e006163...

https://sora.chatgpt.com/p/s_68dc3339c26881918e45f61d9312e95...

Veo:

https://veo-balldrop.wasmer.app/ballroll.mp4

https://veo-balldrop.wasmer.app/balldrop.mp4

Couldn't help but mock them a little, here is a bit of fun... the prompt adherence is pretty good, at least.

NOTE: there are plenty of quite impressive videos being posted, and a lot of horrible ones also.

TheAceOfHearts 2025-09-30 19:59 UTC link
Really impressive engineering work. The videos have gotten good enough that they can grab your attention and trigger a strong uncanny valley feeling.

I think OpenAI is actually doing a great job at easing people into these new technologies. It's not such a huge leap in capabilities that it's shocking, and it helps people acclimate for what's coming. This version is still limited but you can tell that in another generation or two it's going to break through some major capabilities threshold.

To give a comparison: in the LLM model space, the big capabilities threshold event for me came with the release of Gemini 2.5 Pro. The models before that were good in various ways, but that was the first model that felt truly magical.

From a creative perspective, it would be ideal if you could first generate a fixed set of assets, locations, and objects, which are then combined and used to bring multiple scenes to life while providing stronger continuity guarantees.

samuelfekete 2025-09-30 20:56 UTC link
This is a step towards a constant stream of hyper-personalised AI generated content optimised for max dopamine.
cogman10 2025-09-30 22:43 UTC link
I've seen a lot of "this is impressive" but I'm not really seeing it. This looks to suffer from all the same continuity problems other AI videos suffer from.

What am I looking at that's super technically impressive here? The clips look nice, but from one cut to the next there's a lot of obvious differences (usually in the background, sometimes in the foreground).

btbuildem 2025-09-30 22:59 UTC link
They're really playing loose with copyright: you have to actively opt out for them to not use your IP in the generated videos [1]

Tangentially related: it's wild to me that people heading such consequential projects have so little life experience. It's all exuberance and shiny things, zero consideration of the impacts and consequences. First Meta with "Vibes", now this.

1: https://www.gurufocus.com/news/3124829/openai-plans-to-launc...

mscbuck 2025-09-30 23:19 UTC link
I can't help but see these technologies and think of Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park.

My boss sends me complete AI Workslop made with these tools and he goes "Look how wild this is! This is the future" or sends me a youtube video with less than a thousand views of a guy who created UGC with Telegram and point and click tools.

I don't ever think he ever takes a beat, looks at the end product, and asks himself, "who is this for? Who even wants this?", and that's aside from the fact that I still think there are so many obvious tells with this content that make you know right away that it is AI.

davidmurdoch 2025-10-01 01:20 UTC link
I just asked GPT 5 to generate an image of as person. I then asked it to charge the color of their shirt. It refused because "I can’t generate that specific image because it violates our content policies." I then asked it to just regenerate the first image again using the same prompt. It replied "I know this has been frustrating. You’ve been really clear about what you want, and it feels like I’m blocking you for no reason. What’s happening on my side is that the image tool I was using to make the pictures you liked has been disabled, so even if I write the prompt exactly the way you want, I can’t actually send it off to generate a new image right now."

If I start a new chat it works.

I'm a Plus subscriber and didn't hit rate limits.

This video gen tool will probably be even more useless.

baalimago 2025-10-01 06:26 UTC link
They can't even be consistent within their own launch video. Consistency is by far the biggest issue with generative AI. How can a professional studio work with scenes which has continuity errors on every single shot? And if it's not targeting professionals, who is it for?
greyk47 2025-09-30 17:22 UTC link
one of the example prompts is literally: Prompt: in the style of a studio ghibli anime, a boy and his dog run up a grassy scenic mountain with gorgeous clouds, overlooking a village in the distant background
mmmrtl 2025-09-30 17:35 UTC link
I think that's the point... Then world coin comes to the rescue
andrewguenther 2025-09-30 17:42 UTC link
Yes, you can start with a still and a prompt
m3kw9 2025-09-30 18:03 UTC link
I’m wondering how they really prevent uploads of other peoples faces if they take a clip of a video of another person. I’m sure Apple didn’t open up the 3d Face ID scanning to them to verify
armchairhacker 2025-09-30 18:12 UTC link
Record things with 2 cameras.

Today's Sora can produce something that resembles reality from a distance, but if you look closely, especially if there's another perspective or the scene is atypical, the flaws are obvious.

Perhaps tomorrow's Sora will overcome the the "final 10%" and maintain undetectable consistency of objects in 2 perspectives. But that would require a spatial awareness and consistency that models still have a lot of trouble with.

pixl97 2025-09-30 18:25 UTC link
>What's coming next? Bunch of people, with lots of free time watching non-sense AI generated content?

Wasn't this always the outcome of the post labor economy?

For this discussion lets just say that AI+Robots could replace most human labor and thinking. What do people do? Entertainment is going to be the number one time consumer.

quantumHazer 2025-09-30 18:27 UTC link
> just admit it, interns are struggling competing with Claude Code, Cursor and Codex

They are not. This is false, zirp ended, this is the problem. Not LLMs.

gdulli 2025-09-30 18:44 UTC link
It's also possible we remain stuck in the uncanny valley forever, or at least for the rest of our lives.

It's possible to produce some video or image that looks real, cherry-picked for a demo, but not possible to produce any arbitrary one you want that will end up passable.

visarga 2025-09-30 18:59 UTC link
> the ability to include video clips of people and products as a part of the prompt and then create a realistic video with that

This is something I would not like to see, I prefer product videos to be real, I am taking a risk with my money. If the product has hallucinated or unrealistic depiction it would be a kind of fraud.

BeetleB 2025-09-30 19:00 UTC link
Or just going to the Goofs section of a movie on IMDB, and fix the trivial issues (e.g. car had cracked window in earlier scene, and suddenly a normal window in another scene).

Much more mundane, but useful!

ronsor 2025-09-30 19:05 UTC link
> (I'm ignoring copyright aspects, of course, because those are too boring :D)

You must understand that infinite copyright is the author's right, and AI companies must be sued for 50 trillion dollars.

SV_BubbleTime 2025-09-30 19:15 UTC link
>Everything will be fake, nothing real. We are going to have to change the way we interact with video.

I'm optimistic here.

Look at 1900s tech like social security number/card, and paper birth certificates. Our world is changing and new systems of verification will be needed.

I see this as either terribly dystopian - or - a possibility for the mass expansion of cryptography and encrypted/signed communication. Ideally in privacy preserving ways because nothing else will make as much sense when it comes to the verification that countries will need to give each other even if they want backdoor registry BS for the common man.

Breaking changes get fixes.

bopbopbop7 2025-09-30 19:15 UTC link
Try to provide some evidence first that AI is replacing people and that interns are struggling to compete with an LLM.
minimaxir 2025-09-30 19:24 UTC link
Fortunately, you don't need permission from pets to use them in an AI video. (unless PETA objects)
yoavm 2025-09-30 19:31 UTC link
The whole pool the ducks are racing at is a completely different pool when Sam starts talking.
mike_hearn 2025-09-30 19:31 UTC link
It's not that obvious. iOS is pretty secure, if they keep the social network and cameo feature limited to that there might not be good ways to export videos off the platform onto others beyond pointing a camera at the tablet screen. And beyond there being lots of ways to watermark stuff to be detectable, nothing stops the device using its own camera to try and spot if it's being recorded. The bar can be raised quite high as long as you're willing to exclude any device that isn't an iPhone/iPad.
larodi 2025-09-30 19:31 UTC link
its called Virtual Try On (VTO) and there are plenty of models going there for static gfx, it is very reasonable to expect soon emerge those for video VTO.
cyrialize 2025-09-30 19:31 UTC link
I'm fairly certain there is a scene in Minority Report just like this! Or at least, the advertisement says Tom Cruise's character's name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_Report_(film)

fwip 2025-09-30 19:41 UTC link
Not sure if it counts as a continuity error, but in the example "Prompt: Martial artist doing a bo-staff kata waist-deep in a koi pond", his wooden staff changes shape several times, resembling a bow at points. That was the first example I noticed as "clearly AI."
mNovak 2025-09-30 19:41 UTC link
The Bo staff in the koi pond also seems to involve some impossible wrist movements
usaar333 2025-09-30 19:41 UTC link
Physics seems better than veo 3 at least from demo videos
iLoveOncall 2025-09-30 19:44 UTC link
I'm sorry but that's a gross exageration. If any of this was real film then I'd start a gofundme page for OpenAI to get better video production equipment and team because that would be laughably bad.

If anything, it looks a lot worse than a lot of AI-generated videos I've seen in the past, despite being a tech demo with carefully curated shots. Veo 3 just blows this out of the water for example.

Computer0 2025-09-30 19:57 UTC link
Are users of the $20 tier really going to have to deal with that obnoxious bouncing watermark I wonder? The previous watermark could be cropped, but I often didn't feel the need to as I use it for fun, but that would make me not want to show anyone.
bonoboTP 2025-09-30 20:03 UTC link
bflesch 2025-09-30 20:24 UTC link
Good point. I think OpenAI lacks the cultural understanding that tiktok is providing their users not only with entertainment but also social things like trends, reviews, gossip, self-expression. These aspects are not included in the sora experience.
SkyBelow 2025-09-30 20:32 UTC link
My issue is that the copyright aspect are what prevents me from using this as much as I otherwise would.

About 6 months ago I asked a few different AIs if they could translate a song for me as a learning experience, meaning not a simple translation, but more a word by word explanation of what each word meant, how it was conjugated, any more musical/lyrical only uses that aren't common outside of songs, and so on. I was consistently refused on copyright grounds, despite this seeming a fair use given the educational nature. If I pasted a line of the lyrics at a time, it would work initially, but eventually I would need to start a new chat because the AI determined I translated too much at once.

So in this one, if I wanted to ask it to create a video of the moment in Final Fantasy 6 when the bad guy wins, or a video of the main characters of Final Fantasy 7 and 8 having a sword duel, would it outright refuse for copyright reasons?

It sounds like it would block me, which makes me lose a bit of interest in the technology. I could try to get around it, but at what point might that lead to my account being flagged as a trouble maker trying to bypass 'safety' features. I'm hoping in a few years the copyright fights on AI dies down and we get more fair use allowance instead of the tighter limitations to try to prevent calls for tighter regulation.

inerte 2025-09-30 20:38 UTC link
Just yesterday I learned "This summer, two Dramione fics turned rewritten novels became New York Times bestsellers" - https://slate.com/culture/2025/09/alchemised-senlinyu-harry-...

100% sure we will see people re-doing movie parts. Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Phantom_Edit

taberiand 2025-09-30 21:19 UTC link
The Torment Nexus is a Skinner box
crucialfelix 2025-09-30 21:27 UTC link
> It seems like OpenAI is trying to turn Sora into a social network - TikTok but AI.

That's a direct copy of what Midjourney has done already.

https://www.midjourney.com/explore?tab=videos

Many people are just playing with images and the distinctive styles that Midjourney (the model) seems to have developed. It's also trained by ratings and people's interactions.

When you make images you can dial down the "aesthetic".

aubanel 2025-09-30 22:05 UTC link
That, and the dragon looking straight out of How to Train Your Dragon - I wonder if they have agreements with the right holders, or if they expect massive lawsuits to create free advertising for their launch.
Editorial Channel
What the content says
ND
Preamble Preamble

Content not observable

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

Content not observable

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

Content not observable

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Low Practice

Content not observable

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

Content not observable

ND
Article 5 No Torture

Content not observable

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

Content not observable

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

Content not observable

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

Content not observable

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

Content not observable

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

Content not observable

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

Content not observable

ND
Article 12 Privacy

Content not observable

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

Content not observable

ND
Article 14 Asylum

Content not observable

ND
Article 15 Nationality

Content not observable

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

Content not observable

ND
Article 17 Property

Content not observable

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

Content not observable

ND
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
Low Practice

Content not observable

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

Content not observable

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

Content not observable

ND
Article 22 Social Security

Content not observable

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

Content not observable

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

Content not observable

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

Content not observable

ND
Article 26 Education

Content not observable

ND
Article 27 Cultural Participation

Content not observable

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

Content not observable

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

Content not observable

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

Content not observable

Structural Channel
What the site does
-0.15
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
Low Practice
Structural
-0.15
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
ND

JavaScript requirement blocks access to information, limiting information freedom for users with JS disabled

-0.20
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Low Practice
Structural
-0.20
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
ND

Page requires cookies to load, which implies user data collection and tracking

ND
Preamble Preamble

Page requires JavaScript and cookies to load

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 5 No Torture

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 12 Privacy

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 14 Asylum

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 15 Nationality

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 17 Property

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 22 Social Security

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 26 Education

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 27 Cultural Participation

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

Access barrier prevents evaluation

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

Access barrier prevents evaluation

Supplementary Signals
Epistemic Quality
0.02
Propaganda Flags
0 techniques detected
Solution Orientation
No data
Emotional Tone
No data
Stakeholder Voice
No data
Temporal Framing
No data
Geographic Scope
No data
Complexity
No data
Transparency
No data
Event Timeline 20 events
2026-02-26 12:20 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 12:18 rate_limit OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b - -
2026-02-26 12:17 rate_limit OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b - -
2026-02-26 12:16 rate_limit OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b - -
2026-02-26 10:33 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:33 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:33 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:31 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:31 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:29 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:28 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:28 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:27 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:26 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:26 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:26 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:25 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:25 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
2026-02-26 10:24 credit_exhausted Credit balance too low, retrying in 273s - -
2026-02-26 10:24 dlq Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Sora 2 - -
About HRCB | By Right | HN Guidelines | HN FAQ | Source | UDHR | RSS
build 1686d6e+53hr · deployed 2026-02-26 10:15 UTC · evaluated 2026-02-26 12:13:57 UTC