| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite UK petition on digital ID cards sparks debate on surveillance, security, and privacy.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 7 evals | |
Audit Trail
16 entries | 2026-03-05 11:34 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.402 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 11:34 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00 | | | 2026-03-05 11:29 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.402 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 11:29 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) | | | 2026-03-05 11:25 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.520 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 11:25 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.52 (Moderate negative) 0.00 | | | 2026-03-05 11:21 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.520 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 11:21 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.52 (Moderate negative) | | | 2026-03-01 04:54 | model_divergence | Cross-model spread 0.64 exceeds threshold (2 models) | - - | | 2026-03-01 04:54 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.24) | - - | | 2026-03-01 04:54 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.24 (Mild positive) 0.00 | | | reasoning Editorial stance against digital ID cards, citing surveillance concerns | | 2026-03-01 04:49 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.24) | - - | | 2026-03-01 04:49 | model_divergence | Cross-model spread 0.64 exceeds threshold (2 models) | - - | | 2026-03-01 04:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.24 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial stance against digital ID cards, citing surveillance concerns | | 2026-03-01 04:44 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate negative (-0.40) | - - | | 2026-03-01 04:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.40 (Moderate negative) | | | reasoning Petition against digital ID | | |
| |