Meta description explicitly frames ethical and social computing and 'computing for public good.' Advocacy framing evident in og:title and og:description. Page establishes ethical framework as foundational commitment.

No substantive content on human dignity or equality before law in provided header. Cannot assess.

Accessibility infrastructure (skip-to-content, responsive design) suggests non-discrimination in structural design. Limited editorial evidence on Article 2 specifically.

Heavy surveillance infrastructure (Google Ads, LinkedIn, Bing UET, multiple GTM) without clear opt-in consent visible in header creates tension with right to security of person and privacy. Consent mechanisms present but infrastructure dominance suggests tracking-first design.

No content on slavery or servitude observable in provided header.

No content on torture or cruel treatment observable in provided header.

No content on recognition as person before law observable in provided header.

No content on equality before law and protection observable in provided header.

No content on legal remedy observable in provided header.

No content on arbitrary arrest or detention observable in provided header.

No content on fair trial or due process observable in provided header.

No content on presumption of innocence observable in provided header.

Editorial framing emphasizes privacy and consent (meta reference to 'ethical' principles), but structural tracking infrastructure undermines privacy rights protection. Mixed signal with slight negative lean.

No content on freedom of movement observable in provided header.

No content on asylum or refuge observable in provided header.

No content on nationality observable in provided header.

No content on marriage and family observable in provided header.

No content on property rights observable in provided header.

No content on freedom of thought, conscience, or religion observable in provided header.

ACM Code explicitly framed as ethical statement for computing professionals. Editorial positioning emphasizes values-based messaging. Navigation structure provides access to enforcement and reporting mechanisms. Moderate-to-strong positive signal on freedom of expression within professional ethics framework.

ACM is a legitimate professional association with documented governance structure (ACM Council, Boards, Constitution visible in navigation). Code of Ethics positioned as collective professional statement. Organizational legitimacy supports Article 20 assembly and association rights.

ACM Code frames professional participation and governance. Navigation shows member engagement pathways (Join, Volunteer, myACM, committees). Limited but observable commitment to participatory governance in professional association context.

ACM Code of Ethics explicitly frames social and economic rights of computing professionals. Meta description references 'social computing' and public benefit. Positive framing of professional responsibility tied to societal benefit.

ACM Code frames professional responsibility and meaningful work. Navigation emphasizes career development (Career Center, Distinguished Speakers, memberships pathways). Moderate positive signal on work and employment framework.

No content on rest and leisure observable in provided header.

ACM Code explicitly frames computing professional responsibility for societal benefit, public good, and health/safety. Editorial emphasis on 'Hippocratic Oath' analogy directly maps to medical standards for human welfare. Accessibility infrastructure and responsive design support inclusion. Strong positive signal.

ACM describes itself as advancing computing 'as a Science & Profession' and emphasizes education through publications, conferences, and learning resources. Meta description positions Code as foundational to professional education and values transmission.

ACM explicitly frames Code as addressing professional participation in scientific and cultural life of community. Meta framing emphasizes ethical computing and professional responsibility. Strong positive signal on professional participation in societal cultural/intellectual life.

ACM Code and associated governance structure (enforcement procedures, reporting mechanisms) imply framework for social and international order supporting UDHR rights. Limited direct evidence in header but organizational structure supports positive inference.

ACM Code explicitly frames professional duties and responsibilities. Meta description emphasizes that Code guides professionals and expresses conscience of field. Strong editorial signal on duty framework; structural enforcement mechanisms present. Good positive alignment with Article 29.

ACM Code positioned as preventing misuse of professional power and safeguarding professional rights. Code framing as ethical conscience suggests prevention of abuse of professional privilege. Moderate positive signal.