Editorial: Article strongly advocates for transparency, learning from system analysis, and sharing of insights. Structural: Open access, free distribution, social sharing buttons, public RSS feed, email sign-up for updates. Domain context supports: author mission as consultant/educator, access model free, no censorship apparent. High evidence for freedom of expression and information seeking/sharing.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Article title and content directly engage with systematic analysis and knowledge sharing.
RSS feed available for subscribers to follow author's publications.
Email signup form encourages ongoing communication and information access.
Content published under author's name with transparent attribution.
No apparent content restrictions, removals, or editorial filtering.
Inferences
Emphasis on transparent failure analysis promotes freedom to seek and impart information.
Social distribution infrastructure enables freedom of expression across networks.
Author's professional mission (consultant/educator) aligns with facilitating public discourse.
Absence of gatekeeping or editorial censorship affirms commitment to expression rights.
+0.40
Article 27Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.14
Editorial: Article engages in intellectual and cultural participation through systems analysis and design discourse. Advocates for learning from failure as cultural/intellectual contribution. Structural: Attribution to author visible; links to author's work and professional identity; supports dissemination of intellectual work. Moderate positive evidence for cultural/scientific participation.
FW Ratio: 57%
Observable Facts
Article presents original analysis and intellectual contribution to systems thinking discourse.
Author clearly credited with full name and professional attribution.
Content builds on referenced intellectual work (Richard Cook's 'How Complex Systems Fail').
Social sharing enables author to receive credit for intellectual contribution.
Inferences
Author's credited intellectual contribution affirms right to participate in scientific/cultural life.
Engagement with peer knowledge (Cook's work) demonstrates participation in intellectual community.
Attribution structure protects author's moral rights to intellectual work.
+0.35
Article 26Education
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
+0.13
Editorial: Article advocates for systems thinking education and learning from failure—core educational values. Structured around pedagogical principles (clear lessons, accessibility of analysis). Structural: Free content, accessible language, designed for learning and dissemination. Domain context: author/consultant mission supports education. Moderate positive evidence for right to education and human development.
FW Ratio: 57%
Observable Facts
Content presented as numbered lessons (1-12) structured for learning.
Article explicitly aims to teach principles of system failure through accessible language.
Content encourages critical thinking about system design and failure analysis.
Inferences
Pedagogical structure and accessible presentation support right to education.
Author's consultant/educator mission aligns with facilitating human development.
Free distribution enables equitable access to knowledge for educational development.
+0.25
PreamblePreamble
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
ND
Editorial framing emphasizes rational systems thinking and learning from failure, aligned with human dignity and universal reason. No structural signals on domain-level commitment to human rights.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article advocates for learning from system failures and improving designs through transparent analysis.
Content presents failure analysis as educational tool for universal benefit.
Inferences
Emphasis on transparency and learning suggests alignment with values of rational human discourse underlying UDHR.
Absence of explicit human rights framing or social justice context limits evidence strength.
+0.25
Article 29Duties to Community
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
+0.11
Editorial: Article advocates for rational system improvement and shared responsibility—related to community duties. Limited explicit community/collective framing. Structural: Supports dissemination and engagement, but no explicit call for collective action or community responsibility.
FW Ratio: 40%
Observable Facts
Content addresses system design as collective concern affecting multiple stakeholders.
Article implicitly advocates for responsible system design and learning.
Inferences
Systems perspective implies duties to broader community for responsible design.
Educational framing suggests duty to share and improve collective understanding.
Weak evidence due to absence of explicit community/collective action rhetoric.
+0.20
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.11
Editorial: content freely accessible without geographic restriction. Structural: site globally reachable, no geo-blocking, multiple language support via WordPress/internationalization. Domain context supports access (open model, no paywall).
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
Article accessible from any geographic location without registration.
Site uses WordPress with language and localization infrastructure.
No geographic restrictions or paywalls enforced.
Content freely redistributable via social sharing buttons.
Inferences
Unrestricted global access enables freedom of movement and residence in informational sense.
Open publishing model affirms right to leave/return to information sources.
+0.20
Article 28Social & International Order
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
+0.10
Editorial: Content advocates for transparent failure analysis and learning—supports rule of law and rational order. No explicit legal/institutional framing. Structural: No evidence of legal guarantees or institutional backing. Minimal observable signal regarding social/international order supporting rights.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article promotes transparency and rational analysis of system failures.
Content emphasizes clear causation and logical reasoning.
Inferences
Advocacy for transparency and rational analysis aligns with values underlying rule of law.
Absence of explicit institutional/legal context limits evidence for right to social order.
+0.15
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.15
SETL
ND
Content emphasizes rational analysis and shared human understanding of system failure, supporting equal dignity. Limited direct human rights content. Domain mission (consultant/author) supports learning and equity of access.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article presents universal principles about system failure applicable to all system designers and users.
Content is freely accessible without discrimination.
Inferences
Universal framing of system failure principles implies respect for equal dignity of all stakeholders.
Free access model extends principle of equal treatment to all readers.
Page loads Google Analytics tracker (UA-62323223-1) without visible opt-in mechanism.
ShareThis social sharing widget present; MailMunch email capture widget active.
reCAPTCHA v2 implemented, which sends data to Google.
No cookie consent banner or data privacy acknowledgment visible in provided content.
Inferences
Tracking without explicit consent signals potential compromise of user autonomy and privacy rights fundamental to security and bodily/data integrity.
Multiple third-party integrations increase surface area for privacy violation without user awareness.
+0.05
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
+0.22
Editorial content neutral on privacy/interference. Structural signals strongly negative: tracking systems (Google Analytics, ShareThis, reCAPTCHA, MailMunch), email capture form, and social media integration all operate without visible consent/privacy safeguards. Domain tracking ad modifier reinforces negative signal.
FW Ratio: 63%
Observable Facts
Page implements Google Analytics without visible opt-out or consent mechanism.
MailMunch email capture form collects user email with minimal transparency.
ShareThis tracker embedded for social sharing analytics.
reCAPTCHA sends user interaction data to Google.
No privacy policy link visible in provided content.
Inferences
Multiple tracking and data collection mechanisms without explicit consent violate privacy and protection from interference.
Email capture form designed to build mailing list without clear description of data use.
Absence of privacy controls suggests negligence toward privacy rights.
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low Practice
No editorial content addressing discrimination. Site structure shows basic non-discriminatory access; uses reCAPTCHA for bot prevention (neutral practice). No evidence of exclusion by race, gender, status.
FW Ratio: 67%
Observable Facts
Site permits anonymous public access to content without account requirements.
No visible eligibility restrictions based on protected characteristics.
Inferences
Open access structure suggests non-discriminatory design, though absence of explicit anti-discrimination statement limits confidence.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
ND
No observable content addressing slavery or servitude.
ND
Article 5No Torture
ND
No observable content addressing torture or degrading treatment.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
ND
No observable content addressing right to recognition as person before law.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
ND
No observable content addressing equality before law.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
ND
No observable content addressing right to remedy by courts.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
ND
No observable content addressing arbitrary arrest or detention.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
ND
No observable content addressing fair trial.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
ND
No observable content addressing criminal law principles.
ND
Article 14Asylum
ND
No observable content addressing asylum or persecution.
ND
Article 15Nationality
ND
No observable content addressing nationality.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
ND
No observable content addressing marriage or family.
ND
Article 17Property
ND
No observable content addressing property rights.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
ND
No observable content addressing freedom of thought, conscience, religion.
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
Low Practice
No editorial content on assembly/association. Structural: Site allows comments/engagement (comments feed available via RSS), social sharing suggests community participation. However, no explicit community moderation policy visible.
Social media integration (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, email) enables associational networks.
Inferences
Support for comments and social sharing provides infrastructure for peaceful assembly/association.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
ND
No observable content addressing political participation or governance.
ND
Article 22Social Security
ND
No observable content addressing social/economic rights or entitlements.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
ND
No observable content addressing work or employment rights.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
ND
No observable content addressing leisure or rest.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
ND
No observable content addressing health, food, housing, or social services.
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Low Practice
No editorial content on preventing UDHR destruction. Structural: Absence of any indication that rights discussed in article are being denied or abused. No evidence of harmful interpretation or restriction. Minimal but slightly positive signal from neutral stance.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Content presents no argument for limitation or denial of any stated rights.
Inferences
Absence of rights-limiting rhetoric suggests respect for UDHR principles.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Domain Context Profile
Element
Modifier
Affects
Note
Privacy
—
No privacy policy accessible from provided content; reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics present but no explicit privacy commitment.
Terms of Service
—
No Terms of Service visible in provided content.
Accessibility
-0.05
Article 3
Semantic HTML (schema.org markup) present; WCAG-compliant responsive design; however no explicit accessibility statement observed.
Mission
+0.05
Article 19
Site describes author as 'Consultant and Author'; content focuses on systems thinking and educational discourse, supporting transparent communication and learning.
Editorial Code
—
No editorial code of conduct or journalistic standards stated on page.
Ownership
—
Copyright notice present (Dan Ward); personal blog/website; no corporate or institutional conflicts apparent.
Access Model
+0.10
Article 19
Content free and publicly accessible; no paywall or registration barrier; encourages sharing via social widgets.
Ad/Tracking
-0.10
Article 3
Google Analytics present (UA-62323223-1); ShareThis tracking; MailMunch email capture; third-party tracking without explicit opt-in consent mechanism visible.
+0.40
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.29
Editorial: Article strongly advocates for transparency, learning from system analysis, and sharing of insights. Structural: Open access, free distribution, social sharing buttons, public RSS feed, email sign-up for updates. Domain context supports: author mission as consultant/educator, access model free, no censorship apparent. High evidence for freedom of expression and information seeking/sharing.
+0.35
Article 27Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.35
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.14
Editorial: Article engages in intellectual and cultural participation through systems analysis and design discourse. Advocates for learning from failure as cultural/intellectual contribution. Structural: Attribution to author visible; links to author's work and professional identity; supports dissemination of intellectual work. Moderate positive evidence for cultural/scientific participation.
+0.30
Article 26Education
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.30
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.13
Editorial: Article advocates for systems thinking education and learning from failure—core educational values. Structured around pedagogical principles (clear lessons, accessibility of analysis). Structural: Free content, accessible language, designed for learning and dissemination. Domain context: author/consultant mission supports education. Moderate positive evidence for right to education and human development.
+0.25
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Medium Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.25
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
-0.11
Editorial: content freely accessible without geographic restriction. Structural: site globally reachable, no geo-blocking, multiple language support via WordPress/internationalization. Domain context supports access (open model, no paywall).
+0.20
Article 29Duties to Community
Low Framing
Structural
+0.20
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.11
Editorial: Article advocates for rational system improvement and shared responsibility—related to community duties. Limited explicit community/collective framing. Structural: Supports dissemination and engagement, but no explicit call for collective action or community responsibility.
+0.15
Article 20Assembly & Association
Low Practice
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
ND
No editorial content on assembly/association. Structural: Site allows comments/engagement (comments feed available via RSS), social sharing suggests community participation. However, no explicit community moderation policy visible.
+0.15
Article 28Social & International Order
Low Framing
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.10
Editorial: Content advocates for transparent failure analysis and learning—supports rule of law and rational order. No explicit legal/institutional framing. Structural: No evidence of legal guarantees or institutional backing. Minimal observable signal regarding social/international order supporting rights.
+0.10
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low Practice
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
ND
No editorial content addressing discrimination. Site structure shows basic non-discriminatory access; uses reCAPTCHA for bot prevention (neutral practice). No evidence of exclusion by race, gender, status.
+0.10
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Low Practice
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
ND
No editorial content on preventing UDHR destruction. Structural: Absence of any indication that rights discussed in article are being denied or abused. No evidence of harmful interpretation or restriction. Minimal but slightly positive signal from neutral stance.
Editorial content neutral on privacy/interference. Structural signals strongly negative: tracking systems (Google Analytics, ShareThis, reCAPTCHA, MailMunch), email capture form, and social media integration all operate without visible consent/privacy safeguards. Domain tracking ad modifier reinforces negative signal.
ND
PreamblePreamble
Low Framing
Editorial framing emphasizes rational systems thinking and learning from failure, aligned with human dignity and universal reason. No structural signals on domain-level commitment to human rights.
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Framing
Content emphasizes rational analysis and shared human understanding of system failure, supporting equal dignity. Limited direct human rights content. Domain mission (consultant/author) supports learning and equity of access.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
ND
No observable content addressing slavery or servitude.
ND
Article 5No Torture
ND
No observable content addressing torture or degrading treatment.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
ND
No observable content addressing right to recognition as person before law.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
ND
No observable content addressing equality before law.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
ND
No observable content addressing right to remedy by courts.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
ND
No observable content addressing arbitrary arrest or detention.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
ND
No observable content addressing fair trial.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
ND
No observable content addressing criminal law principles.
ND
Article 14Asylum
ND
No observable content addressing asylum or persecution.
ND
Article 15Nationality
ND
No observable content addressing nationality.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
ND
No observable content addressing marriage or family.
ND
Article 17Property
ND
No observable content addressing property rights.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
ND
No observable content addressing freedom of thought, conscience, religion.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
ND
No observable content addressing political participation or governance.
ND
Article 22Social Security
ND
No observable content addressing social/economic rights or entitlements.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
ND
No observable content addressing work or employment rights.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
ND
No observable content addressing leisure or rest.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
ND
No observable content addressing health, food, housing, or social services.